![]() |
Had to re upload due to problems with exporting |
Friday, 19 April 2013
Question 7
Question 7: Looking
back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the
progression from it to the full product?
Throughout the task, I have noticed my understanding of the
codes and conventions has improved, thus making my product seems better than my
original College Magazine compared to my new Music Magazine.
I feel that as I have stuck to a strict plan of what I
wanted to do, rather than making it up as I go the along and following a very
bare and unhelpful plan, have made this product improve dramatically. Also
knowing who I my audience was and doing thorough research on a certain audience
which have a very niche set of interests rather than having a wider audience
where the only thing in common is there age and occupation. Whereas my music
magazine allowed me to go deeper into whom I was making the product for and how
I can make it more appealing to them.
Being an amateur, I felt it was vital for me to get to grips
with software such as in design and Photoshop and try playing around with
different editing styles such as the images and font I used for the text. I
only had basic knowledge of both of the editing software so I felt it was vital
to keep the product basic and to not over do certain things as this may lead to
the product looking over crowded and ‘tacky’.
I felt that the design of the contents went well as I used
very little in terms of design and used contrasting colours to get the
contents, normally a very dull and un-interesting part of any magazine, to look
vibrant and alive even though it is a very basic design. I tried repeating the
same ‘Less is Best’ idea to my double page spread. I originally wanted to have
the band parodying another famous-ish album cover (I was thinking either London
calling by the Clash or Morden World by the Jam) but I was unable due to time
restrictions and meeting deadlines. I also believed it would be too time
consuming in terms of editing the images. Instead I went with simple the simple
route with nothing to fancy and it has come out as I have hoped.
Looking through existing magazines played a large part of my
research; this allowed me to make my mind up pn what I was trying to do and how
I was going to do. I felt that the minimalistic approach that Q magazine went
for looked professional but I didn’t want to take my magazine too seriously so
I added more vibrant colours to the cover. Also understanding WHO my audience
was played an equal, if not more important, than looking at examples. I felt
that I had to get into the head of my audience, this lead to asking members of
my target audience of people what they would want to see in the magazine rather
than what I felt the audience would like to see.
Question 3
Sorry, I didn't feel comfortable talking in-front of my camera. So instead enjoy looking at my desktop.
Question 4 & 5
Question 1
Question 1: In what
ways does your product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real
media products?
Magazines
in general follow tight codes and conventions such as:
- · A large dominant title
- · Extra promotional features such as puffs and other images
- · A dominant background image
- · A bar code on the right hand side along with an issue number and a date
Normally
a music magazine goes along with the same codes and conventions as other
magazines but I decided to experiment with some ideas to make my magazine seem
different and more appealing to my audience.
To
start with, I decided against using a large title going across the cover.
Instead, I used the top let hand corner to put my simple title of OI!. I did
this because it not only parody’s OK! magazine (which, in a way, is the binary
opposite of my magazine) but to make it eye catching on the magazine rack. Also
the name OI! Can be addressed as the magazine yelling at a passerby to pick it
up and look at it.
I
have also decided against using puffs, I wanted the magazine to be like the
punk music and be completely stripped down and be only built up on the would
basics and what’s important to the magazine, so in this case it’s the 3 main
articles that I feel are important and be interesting to the reader. I also
chose to put them on the left third to make it appealing to the audience and it
allows them to see what’s in the magazine at just a glance.
Another
feature I added was the banner going across the top of the cover. Most
magazines have some form of banner going across the masthead with a slogan, I
choose to follow this convention because it gives the magazine something to be
remembered by and show what the magazine is there to represent and do something
for its audience.
I
chose a different approach with the main image as I didn’t want it to take up
the whole of the cover. I felt that it was appropriate to make the image black
and white because it shows the rawness of the music genre and it also goes well
with the colour scheme of the cover. Furthermore it gives the cover an old
school Punk/DIY feel, which I think would be appealing to members of my chosen
audience.
To
conclude, even though I have chosen to go against the normal codes and
conventions, I feel that my product works because it’s so different in terms of
aesthetic looks. Also by looking different it stands out from other products
and goes hand in hand with the genre of punk which I was trying to recreate to
attract my audience.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)